Regulators want to increase the scope of regulation on cheese. An interesting concoction of mathematics and creative logic has convinced regulators on the risk of certain cheeses – that have not caused a single documented problem in the last 23 years…
“(I have spent much of the last week reading a 189-page report issued jointly by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and Health Canada, with the dry title, “Joint FDA/Health Canada Quantitative Assessment of the Risk of Listeriosis from Soft-Ripened Cheese Consumption in the United States and Canada”. The reading is as dry as the title suggests. It’s full of technical statistical and research terminology, terms like “risk characterization,” “sensitivity analysis,” “mitigation,” “rank correlation,” and on and on. What that meant was that I had to read everything two, three, and four times before I could begin to make sense of it. But the more I read, the more upset I became, because I realized this is a very important document, one that could have a huge effect on food availability. If the authors of this report are successful in accomplishing what they want to accomplish with brie and camembert cheeses, you can be sure they will continue on to other kinds of cheese, and then other entire categories of food products, in their endless search for supposedly serious pathogen dangers. Equally troubling, the FDA considers this report ”science based and transparent,” when it is anything but. I wrote the following analysis to try to get my thoughts down in an orderly way. I encourage you, after you’ve read my assessment, to try your own hand at reading the report, or at least the summary, and then to take the opportunity the FDA is offering to provide comments, and let the agency know in no uncertain terms what you think about this particular piece of literature. )”
The medical industry has successfully raised the barrier of what can be called healthy or medicinal, to isolated active ingredients. A herb with multiple active ingredients is too complicated to understand without millions of dollars in research. We should trust our doctors and stick to well researched ingredients.
Doctors then prescribe an annual average of 18 of these safe medicines, creating a medicinal cocktail, which once again is not understood by science. As medical students, they do teach us polypharmacy, and warn us of the dangers of combining multiple medicines, but the medical profession prefers to focus on the mistakes of their competitors, ignoring their own shortcomings – much like the alternative health crowd they detest.
A new Israeli study showed how over 80% of patients improved simply by stopping all their medications.
http://www.google.co.th/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=patients prescribed up to 25 different drugs&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CC8QFjAA&url=http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-2280761/Pills-The-patients-prescribed-25-different-drugs-day-devastating-results.html&ei=xRcjUaqPIcftrAeKuYGoCw&usg=AFQjCNHsa0V_DYDTWnzMMm1Sm-F_9XEytQ&bvm=bv.42553238,d.bmk
I linked to an article on food fraud a couple of weeks back. I have been bumping into that article all over, It seems the message on olive oil is getting around. I want to share a few more general ideas on the subject, and a couple more links to related news.
EU Standards and Fraud
It seems people are waking up to the fact that the food fraud is not just a corporate issue, but related to organized crime. Some years earlier I was looking into importing basic food commodities to Europe, and I was warned by families in central Europe against the idea, because they said that entering commodity markets is only possible with ties to organized crime, or politics. We like to laugh at the Americans, but we have barely started with the problems back home.
People with power are quite able to avoid the high standards we have built to protect us, making our standards a barrier of entry, rather then a guarantee of quality. If European fishers want to enter Somalian coastal waters to hoard their fish, we will send in our navies to back them up. If the Somalians claim EU dumps their nuclear waste in their waters, we don’t bother to check their claims, any more then we did in Lebanon in the 90′s. There are serious structural issues underlying the narrow debate of food fraud.
At emergent health we are interested in supplements, and although we are just getting started, we are becoming alarmingly aware that the issue is relevant too. I walk around the Bangkok Chinatown, and all the shops selling 20-30k$ cordyceps admit there is no way to know about the quality. In the internet there are warnings of contamination with heavy particles, as a 0.1g increase in weight will bring in a few dollars of profit.
Quality in supplements seems quite important. I found a shop squeezing fresh centella (kotu kola) juice, and every time I visit the shop their juice flips my lid. I feel a rush of mental clarity, and a clear balancing of blood sugar. Inspired by this I ordered a kilo of dried organic centella from an online vendor. It does not matter how much of this dried powder I consume, I cant feel a thing. Last time I visited China Town, I tried another shops fresh centella juice, and once again I could not feel a thing. Olli Posti, who visited me a moment back gave me a chance to verify my theory on centella, since he is well aquinted with standardised centella extracts – he verified the first shop as the real thing, and the others as ineffective.
Olli posti stresses quality in all things, he prefers to only use products that come from single producers. The company must grow and package the product themselves, and openly discuss production methods online. He believes anyone who is passionate about the quality of their product will be found on youtube ranting on their vision. Olli would not trust, nor support a company that uses ‘secret propriety methods’, his money is a vote for the type of business he believes in. Further more he believes this leads him to products that are even higher quality then current standards (organic, etc) identify.
More News on Food Fraud:
This article explores a few areas where food fraud includes adding dangerous ingredients, not just a reduction of quality.
Here Dr Mercola (who’s words should always be taken with a bit of skepticism discusses food fraud in the meat industry.
I’ve been googling trophology, the art of combining (or rather separating) different ingredients for better digestion. The first thing I noticed is that the people proposing these diets use largely scientific arguments, but that the scientists are not convinced. In supplement and diet issues I like to google bodybuilding forums, because you always find open minded people who are nutritionally literate, and apply serious stress to their bodies. You’d expect them to notice a difference. Here first there is a link to trophology, and then to a bodybuilding forum where they are yet to be convinced.
I’m ok to try this, but at a first glance all I read has worked against empowerment its all lists on what I cant do. I have yet to bump into a single site taking photos or giving approachable examples I could apply. Do I really want to spend all my energy on a debilitating project that focuses on refusal rather then alternatives?
“ Mainstream medicine tells us that the hepatitis B virus (HBV) causes liver cancer which is why it is so necessary for US newborns to be vaccinated within hours of birth. We are told that the human papillomavirus (HPV), which is supposedly so prevalent in our population, causes cervical cancer which is why there is such a push to vaccinate girls and boys in the US as early as 9 years old. Let’s not forget about Simian Virus 40 (SV40) which is known to have contaminated polio vaccines and is associated with a wide variety of human cancers. Conventional wisdom tells us that viruses cause cancer. But is this true? Let’s investigate the story further.”